STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs REEMA S. CHATTERJEE — C.A. No. 6442/1998

Case under 36P-persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 and Mental Health Care Act, 2017 Section III. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010189351998

Filing Date

21-Nov-1998

Registration No

C.A. No. 6442/1998

Diary Number

18935/1998

Order Date

28-Apr-2026

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

36P-Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 and Mental Health Care Act, 2017 Section III

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

    Adv. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.REEMA S. CHATTERJEE

    Adv. V. N. RAGHUPATHY SUCHITRA ATUL CHITALE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Apr-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 25-Apr-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 24-Apr-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 24-Apr-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 28-Mar-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 28-Mar-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 09-Jan-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 09-Jan-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 08-Dec-2016
  11. 08-Dec-2016

    JudgmentView PDF

  12. 08-Dec-2016
  13. 01-Dec-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 01-Dec-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 16-Nov-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 16-Nov-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 30-Sep-2016
  18. 30-Sep-2016
  19. 31-Aug-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 31-Aug-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 27-Jul-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 27-Jul-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 26-Apr-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 26-Apr-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 14-Mar-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 14-Mar-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 24-Feb-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 24-Feb-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 24-Feb-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 24-Nov-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 24-Nov-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 13-Oct-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 13-Oct-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  34. 14-Sep-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  35. 14-Sep-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  36. 20-Jul-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  37. 20-Jul-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  38. 08-Jul-2015
  39. 08-Jul-2015
  40. 15-May-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  41. 15-May-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  42. 26-Mar-2015
  43. 26-Mar-2015
  44. 10-Feb-2015
  45. 10-Feb-2015
  46. 08-Jan-2015
  47. 08-Jan-2015
  48. 07-Apr-2014
  49. 26-Mar-2014

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  50. 26-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  51. 21-Jan-2014
  52. 19-Nov-2013
  53. 30-Sep-2013
  54. 14-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  55. 08-Aug-2013
  56. 31-Jul-2013
  57. 01-Jul-2013
  58. 14-Jan-2013
  59. 18-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  60. 09-Nov-2006
  61. 08-Nov-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  62. 19-Jul-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  63. 19-Jul-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  64. 17-Feb-2005
  65. 11-Jan-2005
  66. 28-Jan-2004
  67. 07-Aug-2003
  68. 24-Mar-2003
  69. 20-Dec-2002
  70. 15-Nov-2002
  71. 13-Nov-2002
  72. 04-Oct-2002
  73. 01-Oct-2002
  74. 19-Jul-2002
  75. 26-Apr-2002
  76. 18-Apr-2002
  77. 19-Mar-2002
  78. 22-Nov-2001
  79. 03-Oct-2001
  80. 13-Sep-2001
  81. 21-Nov-1998

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 6442/1998

  82. 11-Jan-0005
  83. [ 2026 INSC 441 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

  84. [ 2025 INSC 1101 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Justice Sunanda Bhandare Foundation v. Union of India (2026 INSC 441) Note: The document provided does not match the case details requested (C.A. No. 006442/1998, State of Maharashtra v. Reema S. Chatterjee). The judgment is actually WPC 116/1998 with related Civil Appeal 11938/2016. Court Decision Summary: The Supreme Court addressed implementation of disability rights protections under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. The Court found widespread non-compliance by States and Union Territories in appointing Nodal Officers despite previous orders, expressing "serious displeasure" at the delay. It endorsed the Union's clarification permitting meritorious disabled candidates to compete for unreserved positions on their own merit while preserving reservation benefits. Notably, the Court delegated substantive monitoring of statutory compliance to National Law Universities under "Project Ability Empowerment," recognizing that nearly eight years post-enactment, full implementation remains elusive, while tasking these institutions with detailed assessments across all jurisdictions to ensure effective realization of disability rights mandates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case