STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs REEMA S. CHATTERJEE — C.A. No. 6442/1998
Case under 36P-persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 and Mental Health Care Act, 2017 Section III. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010189351998
Filing Date
21-Nov-1998
Registration No
C.A. No. 6442/1998
Diary Number
18935/1998
Order Date
28-Apr-2026
Document Type
Judgement - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Adv. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.REEMA S. CHATTERJEE
Adv. V. N. RAGHUPATHY SUCHITRA ATUL CHITALE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Apr-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Apr-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Apr-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Apr-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Mar-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Mar-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Jan-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Jan-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Dec-2016
ROPView PDF
-
08-Dec-2016
JudgmentView PDF
-
08-Dec-2016
ROPView PDF
-
01-Dec-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Dec-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Nov-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Nov-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Sep-2016
ROPView PDF
-
30-Sep-2016
ROPView PDF
-
31-Aug-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Aug-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Jul-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Jul-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Apr-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Apr-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Mar-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Mar-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Feb-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Feb-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Feb-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Nov-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Nov-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Oct-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Oct-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Sep-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Sep-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Jul-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Jul-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Jul-2015
ROPView PDF
-
08-Jul-2015
ROPView PDF
-
15-May-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-May-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Mar-2015
ROPView PDF
-
26-Mar-2015
ROPView PDF
-
10-Feb-2015
ROPView PDF
-
10-Feb-2015
ROPView PDF
-
08-Jan-2015
ROPView PDF
-
08-Jan-2015
ROPView PDF
-
07-Apr-2014
ROPView PDF
-
26-Mar-2014
Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Mar-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Jan-2014
ROPView PDF
-
19-Nov-2013
ROPView PDF
-
30-Sep-2013
ROPView PDF
-
14-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Aug-2013
ROPView PDF
-
31-Jul-2013
ROPView PDF
-
01-Jul-2013
ROPView PDF
-
14-Jan-2013
ROPView PDF
-
18-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Nov-2006
ROPView PDF
-
08-Nov-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Jul-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Jul-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Feb-2005
ROPView PDF
-
11-Jan-2005
ROPView PDF
-
28-Jan-2004
ROPView PDF
-
07-Aug-2003
ROPView PDF
-
24-Mar-2003
ROPView PDF
-
20-Dec-2002
ROPView PDF
-
15-Nov-2002
ROPView PDF
-
13-Nov-2002
ROPView PDF
-
04-Oct-2002
ROPView PDF
-
01-Oct-2002
ROPView PDF
-
19-Jul-2002
ROPView PDF
-
26-Apr-2002
ROPView PDF
-
18-Apr-2002
ROPView PDF
-
19-Mar-2002
ROPView PDF
-
22-Nov-2001
ROPView PDF
-
03-Oct-2001
ROPView PDF
-
13-Sep-2001
ROPView PDF
-
21-Nov-1998
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 6442/1998
-
11-Jan-0005
ROPView PDF
-
[ 2026 INSC 441 ]
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
-
[ 2025 INSC 1101 ]
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters
Lead case: W.P.(C) No. 116/1998
Case Summary: Justice Sunanda Bhandare Foundation v. Union of India (2026 INSC 441) Note: The document provided does not match the case details requested (C.A. No. 006442/1998, State of Maharashtra v. Reema S. Chatterjee). The judgment is actually WPC 116/1998 with related Civil Appeal 11938/2016. Court Decision Summary: The Supreme Court addressed implementation of disability rights protections under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. The Court found widespread non-compliance by States and Union Territories in appointing Nodal Officers despite previous orders, expressing "serious displeasure" at the delay. It endorsed the Union's clarification permitting meritorious disabled candidates to compete for unreserved positions on their own merit while preserving reservation benefits. Notably, the Court delegated substantive monitoring of statutory compliance to National Law Universities under "Project Ability Empowerment," recognizing that nearly eight years post-enactment, full implementation remains elusive, while tasking these institutions with detailed assessments across all jurisdictions to ensure effective realization of disability rights mandates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts