ADDL.CHIEF COMMR. GMADA . vs JASPAL SINGH . — SLP(C) No. 18357 - 18358/2009

Case under Section I-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010188002009

Filing Date

03-Jul-2009

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 18357 - 18358/2009

Diary Number

18800/2009

Order Date

18-May-2011

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section I-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ADDL.CHIEF COMMR. GMADA .

    Adv. NARESH BAKSHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JASPAL SINGH .

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 15-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 14-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 16-Dec-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 04-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 05-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 01-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 12-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 30-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 21-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 03-Jul-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 18357 - 18358/2009

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 018357-018358/2009 Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed the interlocutory applications (IA Nos. 2-3) filed by the petitioners. The Court rejected the petitioners' application to recall the February 14, 2011 order, finding that their assertion about filing requisite process fees and spare copies was incorrect—they had filed only two copies instead of four and persisted in this default for over one year. The Court held that once respondents 3 and 4 were impleaded as parties, the petitioners had a duty to serve notice upon them, and this failure could not be justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case