SWAMI TRIYOGANANDJI MAHARAJ vs SHYAM LAL CHAUHAN — C.A. No. 6319/2010

Case under Section XVI. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010187962009

Filing Date

03-Jul-2009

Registration No

C.A. No. 6319/2010

Diary Number

18796/2009

Order Date

08-Feb-2018

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XVI

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SWAMI TRIYOGANANDJI MAHARAJ

    Adv. ATISHI DIPANKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHYAM LAL CHAUHAN

    Adv. JITENDRA KUMAR T. MAHIPAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Feb-2018

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Ramana and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer

  3. 31-Jan-2018

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Ramana and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer

  4. 24-Jan-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 20-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 31-Jan-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 18-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 30-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 05-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 22-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 15-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 07-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 04-Jan-2010

    ROPView PDF

  14. 11-Dec-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 18-Nov-2009

    ROPView PDF

  16. 10-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 03-Jul-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 6319/2010

Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters

Lead case: C.A. No. 6318/2010

PDF 1PDF 2PDF 3PDF 4PDF 5
View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 006319 / 2010 The Supreme Court's Registrar ordered that both the appellant (Swami Triyoganandji Maharaj) and respondent (Shyam Lal Chauhan) forfeited their right to file statements of case after failing to comply with the October 18, 2012 direction to file within four weeks. The matter was listed for further hearing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules, with no additional interim steps permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case