M/S RECKITT BENCKISER (INDIA) LTD. vs COMMISSIONER COMMERCIAL TAXES — C.A. No. 1335/2010

Case under Section XI-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010187222009

Filing Date

03-Jul-2009

Registration No

C.A. No. 1335/2010

Diary Number

18722/2009

Order Date

10-Apr-2023

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2023 INSC 328

Disposal Type

Partly Allowed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XI-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S RECKITT BENCKISER (INDIA) LTD.

    Adv. APARNA JHA[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.COMMISSIONER COMMERCIAL TAXES

    Adv. C. K. SASI[R-2] C. K. SASI[R-3] C. K. SASI[R-1] R. SATHISH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2023

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 10-Apr-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 10-Apr-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice C.T. Ravikumar

  5. 15-Sep-2022

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 15-Sep-2022

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari

  7. 14-Sep-2022

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari

  8. 13-Sep-2022

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari

  9. 08-Sep-2022

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari

  10. 07-Sep-2022

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari

  11. 19-Feb-2020

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 19-Feb-2020

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

  13. 07-Feb-2020

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 07-Feb-2020

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari

  15. 31-Jan-2020

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 31-Jan-2020

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari

  17. 28-Nov-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 28-Nov-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant

  19. 14-Aug-2019

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer

  20. 22-Jul-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 22-Jul-2019

    Auto Updated (Cmis)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.A. Bobde and Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai

  22. 27-Jul-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 27-Jul-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Registrar (J) - II

  24. 14-May-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 14-May-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Registrar (J) - II

  26. 05-Apr-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 05-Apr-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 11-Jul-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 17-Oct-2013
  30. 19-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 29-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 17-Feb-2012
  33. 02-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  34. 18-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  35. 08-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  36. 30-Oct-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  37. 24-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  38. 03-Jul-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 1335/2010

  39. [ 2023 INSC 328 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Supreme Court partly allowed Reckitt Benckiser's appeal against Kerala VAT classification. The Court confirmed that mosquito mats/coils, Mortein insect killers, Harpic, and Lizol fall under specific entries (mosquito repellents and cleaning products) at 12.5% VAT, not agricultural insecticides at 4%. However, the Court reversed the High Court's decision on Dettol Antiseptic Liquid, holding it qualifies as a medicament under Entry 36(8)(h)(vi) due to its therapeutic/prophylactic properties, making it taxable at 4% instead of the residuary rate of 12.5%. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case