DEEPTI BHANDARI vs NITIN BHANDARI — SLP(Crl) No. 5213/2010

Case under Section II-D. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010185092010

Filing Date

17-Jun-2010

Registration No

SLP(Crl) No. 5213/2010

Diary Number

18509/2010

Order Date

14-Dec-2011

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-D

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEEPTI BHANDARI

    Adv. HARISH PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NITIN BHANDARI

    Adv. PRAGATI NEEKHRA MUKUL KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Dec-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 01-Dec-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 24-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 09-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 02-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 25-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 09-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 12-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 11-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 13-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 01-Apr-2011
  13. 11-Mar-2011
  14. 18-Feb-2011
  15. 14-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 07-Jan-2011
  17. 05-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 15-Nov-2010
  19. 08-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 06-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 01-Sep-2010
  22. 09-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 21-Jun-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 17-Jun-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(Crl) No. 5213/2010

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Deepti Bhandari v. Nitin Bhandari (SLP(Crl) No. 005213/2010) The Supreme Court allowed the petitioner's Special Leave Petition and Transfer Petitions, modifying the High Court's visitation order. The Court transferred matrimonial and guardianship cases from Jaipur Family Court to Delhi, and modified visitation rights to allow the respondent (husband) to meet their minor daughter on every Saturday in New Delhi (10:00 a.m.–6:00 p.m.) instead of Jaipur, with liberty to take the child out for the day if she consents. Each party bears its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case