R. SURESHLAL vs DURAISAMY (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND ORS. — C.A. No. 3117/2007
Case under Section XII-B. Status: DISPOSED.
CNR: SCIN010183662006
Filing Date
22-Jul-2006
Registration No
C.A. No. 3117/2007
Diary Number
18366/2006
Order Date
24-Jul-2019
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Data as of 30-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
R. SURESHLAL
Adv. REVATHY RAGHAVAN
Respondent(s)
DURAISAMY (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND ORS.
Adv. R. AYYAM PERUMAL
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA
After Week/Month/Vacation
After Week/Month/Vacation
After Week/Month/Vacation
After Week/Month/Vacation
After Week/Month/Vacation
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-Jul-2019 | After Week/Month/Vacation |
| 23-Jul-2019 | After Week/Month/Vacation |
| 16-Jul-2019 | After Week/Month/Vacation |
| 02-May-2019 | After Week/Month/Vacation |
| 07-Mar-2019 | After Week/Month/Vacation |
Orders
CASE SUMMARY The Supreme Court dismissed R. Sureshlal's appeal challenging the High Court's decision that set aside eviction orders against six tenants. Sureshlal, acting as Power of Attorney for the property owner's heirs, had filed eviction petitions under the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act on grounds of personal bona fide need, building age (40+ years), and alleged structural danger requiring demolition. The High Court found the eviction grounds failed due to: (1) no reconstruction plan, engineer's report, or proof of financial resources; (2) owner's occupation and demolition grounds being mutually destructive; and (3) insufficient evidence of structural defects. The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's judgment but granted liberty for Sureshlal to file fresh applications with appropriate supporting material. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts