CHANDER BHAN (D) BY LRS. . vs UNION OF INDIA — C.A. No. 225/2005

Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010183552003

Filing Date

03-Sep-2003

Registration No

C.A. No. 225/2005

Diary Number

18355/2003

Order Date

26-Sep-2013

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XIV-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHANDER BHAN (D) BY LRS. .

    Adv. HARINDER MOHAN SINGH (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA

    Adv. ANIL KATIYAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 06-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 12-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 09-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 26-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 25-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 13-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 03-Jan-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 07-Jan-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 24-Sep-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 23-Apr-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 19-Mar-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 20-Feb-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 28-Nov-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 14-Nov-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 31-Oct-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 03-Sep-2003

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 225/2005

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of C.A. No. 225/2005 – Chander Bhan v. Union of India The Supreme Court allowed the appellants' appeals and enhanced land acquisition compensation from Rs.9,000-6,000 per bigha to Rs.22,000 per bigha, finding the Delhi High Court had discriminated against them by awarding lesser compensation than similarly situated landowners in contiguous villages whose lands were acquired under the same 1959 notification for Delhi's planned development. The Court directed the Union of India to issue demand drafts within eight weeks with all statutory benefits and interest, with contempt proceedings threatened for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case