FERRODOUS ESTATES (PVT) LTD. vs P.GOPIRATHNAM (DEAD) AND ORS. — C.A. No. 13516/2015

Case under Section XII-B. Status: DISPOSED.

CNR: SCIN010183182007

DISPOSED

Filing Date

05-Jul-2007

Registration No

C.A. No. 13516/2015

Diary Number

18318/2007

Order Date

12-Oct-2020

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2020 INSC 586

Disposal Type

Appeals Allowed

Data as of 30-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-B

Petitioner(s)

FERRODOUS ESTATES (PVT) LTD.

Adv. GEETHA KOVILAN[P-1] [Pr]

Respondent(s)

P.GOPIRATHNAM (DEAD) AND ORS.

Adv. VIKAS MEHTA[R-2.2] VIKAS MEHTA[R-2.1] VIJAY KUMAR[R-4.2] VIJAY KUMAR[R-4.2] T. R. B. SIVAKUMAR[R-7] T. R. B. SIVAKUMAR[R-6] VIKAS MEHTA[R-1] [Pr] VIJAY KUMAR[R-1] VIKAS MEHTA[R-4.2]

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH

12-Oct-2020

Fixed Date by Court

30-Sep-2020

Fixed Date by Court

24-Sep-2020

Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

22-Sep-2020

Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

10-Sep-2020

Fixed Date by Court

Orders

[ 2020 INSC 586 ] Judgement - of Main Case
View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

FERRODOUS ESTATES (PVT) LTD. v. P. GOPIRATHNAM & ORS. - Summary Case Citation: C.A. No. 013516/2015, Supreme Court of India Court Decision: The Supreme Court allowed the appellant's appeal, restored the trial court's decree for specific performance, and required the appellant to pay Rs. 1.25 crores to the respondents within eight weeks. The Division Bench's reversal on ground of the Urban Land Ceiling Act violation was set aside. Key Reasoning: The Court held that the agreement's clause 4 explicitly required the *vendors* (not the purchaser) to obtain Urban Land Ceiling permission. Since this condition was part of the agreement itself, enforcing it did not violate land ceiling laws. The defendants' failure to obtain permission constituted breach, not a bar to specific performance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Supreme Court of India All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case