BIHAR STATE EELECTRICITY BOARD vs M/S.PULAK ENTERPRISES . — C.A. No. 7220 - 7239/2000

Case under Section XVI. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010183092000

Filing Date

30-Oct-2000

Registration No

C.A. No. 7220 - 7239/2000

Diary Number

18309/2000

Order Date

25-Jan-2010

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XVI

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BIHAR STATE EELECTRICITY BOARD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S.PULAK ENTERPRISES .

    Adv. SUNITA SHARMA MANJULA GUPTA AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA GOPAL PRASAD S. CHANDRA SHEKHAR PRAVEEN KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 15-Apr-2009

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 15-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 27-Apr-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 09-Mar-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 08-Feb-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 19-Sep-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 25-Mar-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 12-Dec-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 11-Dec-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 28-Nov-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 29-Oct-2002
  14. 08-Oct-2002
  15. 05-Aug-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 23-Jul-2001
  17. 02-Feb-2001
  18. 08-Dec-2000
  19. 07-Dec-2000

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 30-Oct-2000

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 7220 - 7239/2000

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Bihar State Electricity Board v. M/S Pulak Enterprises On 25 January 2010, the Supreme Court heard applications (IAs 122-142/2009) seeking clarification of paragraph 46 from a prior judgment dated 15 April 2009. Bihar State Electricity Board sought modification of the Court's direction to work out a Rs. 100 crore adjustment within three months, arguing the direction was unimplementable due to unsettled disputes with coal companies. The Court found no ambiguity when paragraph 46 was read in context with paragraph 45 and extended the completion deadline by an additional four months from the hearing date. The applications were disposed accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case