MANGILAL CHANDANMALJI SHAH (D) TH.LRS. vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. HOME AFAIRS SECRETARY — C.A. No. 1487/2006

Case under 3102_3Jj-land Laws, Agricultural Tenancy, Land Revenue : Three Judge Matter Section III. Status: DISPOSED.

CNR: SCIN010182732005

DISPOSED

Filing Date

24-Aug-2005

Registration No

C.A. No. 1487/2006

Diary Number

18273/2005

Order Date

24-Sep-2025

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Data as of 30-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

3102_3jj-Land Laws, Agricultural tenancy, Land Revenue : Three Judge Matter Section III

Petitioner(s)

MANGILAL CHANDANMALJI SHAH (D) TH.LRS.

Adv. RAHUL JAIN

Respondent(s)

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. HOME AFAIRS SECRETARY

Adv. DEVENDRA SINGH MEHRA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH

24-Sep-2025

Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

22-Jul-2025

Fixed Date by Court

21-May-2025

Fixed Date by Court

19-May-2025

Fixed Date by Court

15-May-2025

Fixed Date by Court

Orders in this case

[ 2025 INSC 1145 ] Judgement - of Main Case
18-Nov-2014 Office Report
07-Mar-2014 ROP
30-Jul-2012 ROP
04-May-2012 ROP
13-Apr-2012 ROP
10-Apr-2012 ROP
10-Apr-2012 ROP
23-Mar-2012 ROP
19-Mar-2012 ROP
13-Jan-2012 ROP
09-Dec-2005 ROP

Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters

Lead case: C.A. No. 1479/2006

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary of C.A. No. 001487/2006 (Mangilal Chandanmalji Shah v. Union of India) Decision: The Supreme Court of India upheld the High Court's judgment, dismissing all appeals. The land rescission orders dated 30.04.1974 were found valid and legally sustainable. Key Reasoning: The Court ruled that Article 12 of the Organic Agraria (OA) governing land grants in Dadra and Nagar Haveli is the applicable law. The Collector properly invoked this provision to rescind land grants when grantees failed to cultivate lands according to mandatory conditions. The Court rejected all pleas of waiver, acquiescence, delay, and impossibility, holding that statutory obligations rooted in public interest cannot be waived. The 1971 Land Reforms Regulation's savings clause did not invalidate proceedings initiated under the prior regime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Supreme Court of India All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case