ATIKUR RAHMAN vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL — Crl.A. No. 1332/2013

Case under 1511Li-criminal Law : Criminal Matters Other Than Covered by the Aforesaid Categories(cases Where Life Sentence Is Imposed) Section II-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010182312012

Filing Date

23-May-2012

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 1332/2013

Diary Number

18231/2012

Order Date

06-Aug-2025

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Partly Allowed

Last updated 07-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

1511LI-Criminal Law : Criminal matters other than covered by the aforesaid categories(Cases where life sentence is imposed) Section II-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ATIKUR RAHMAN

    Adv. SUBHASISH BHOWMICK[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

    Adv. KUNAL MIMANI[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Aug-2025

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 06-Aug-2025

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Joymalya Bagchi

  4. 30-Jul-2025

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 30-Jul-2025

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh

  6. 24-Jul-2025

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 24-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 13-Aug-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 03-Jul-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 22-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 30-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 29-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 19-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 07-May-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 01-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 24-Jan-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 26-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 17-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 20-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 23-May-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1332/2013

casestatus.in Summary

In Criminal Appeal No. 1332/2013, the Supreme Court allowed Atikur Rahman's appeal in part. The core issue was whether Rahman was a juvenile at the time of committing the offence. A District Magistrate report from Murshidabad confirmed he was indeed a juvenile, a fact also acknowledged by the State's counter affidavit. While confirming the conviction, the Court modified the sentence to the period already undergone by Rahman and discharged his bail bonds. All pending applications were disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case