SUBIR BOSE vs INSPECTOR OF FACTORIES — Crl.A. No. 1963/2010
Case under Section II-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010182292009
Filing Date
26-Jun-2009
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 1963/2010
Diary Number
18229/2009
Order Date
24-Sep-2019
Document Type
Judgement - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2019 INSC 1073
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUBIR BOSE
Adv. MEERA MATHUR[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.INSPECTOR OF FACTORIES
Adv. MERUSAGAR SAMANTARAY[R-1] [Gr] MEERA MATHUR[R-2]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Sep-2019
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Sep-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Sep-2019
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indu Malhotra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Subhash Reddy
-
04-Sep-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Sep-2019
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indu Malhotra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna
-
03-Sep-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Sep-2019
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indira Banerjee and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna
-
27-Aug-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Aug-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Oct-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Jun-2009
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1963/2010
-
[ 2019 INSC 1073 ]
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
Case Summary: Subir Bose v. Inspector of Factories (2010) The Supreme Court convicted Managing Director Subir Bose under Section 92 of the Factories Act, 1948 for operating a Berger Paints factory in Goa without proper license/permission following a 2006 fire incident. Though the complaint alleged violations of safety provisions (Sections 37-38), a police closure report found no criminal charges warranted, and the complaint lacked specific details about safety breaches. Accepting Bose's plea of guilty to resolve litigation efficiently given his advanced age (70+) and minor injuries to the sole affected worker, the Court imposed a fine of Rs. 1,00,000 with 8 weeks simple imprisonment as default penalty, treating this resolution as case-specific and non-precedential. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts