KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. vs STATE OF U.P.. — SLP(C) No. 14890 - 14891/2009

Case under Section XI. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010182062009

Filing Date

25-Jun-2009

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 14890 - 14891/2009

Diary Number

18206/2009

Order Date

29-Jan-2013

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XI

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD.

    Adv. E. C. AGRAWALA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P..

    Adv. GUNNAM VENKATESWARA RAO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Jan-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 22-Jan-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 10-Jan-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 13-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 30-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 01-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 12-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 29-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 24-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 26-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 09-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 03-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 12-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 14-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 16-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 20-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 25-Jun-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 14890 - 14891/2009

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: On 29 January 2013, the Supreme Court disposed of Kotak Mahindra Bank's special leave petitions challenging a High Court order regarding a Section 33 order under the Indian Stamp Act, 1899. The Court upheld the High Court's decision to relegate the bank to the appellate remedy, noting that while procedural issues raised by the petitioner under Section 31 required examination, the appellate authority was the appropriate forum to consider them. The Court directed the appellate authority to decide the pending appeal within three months from receipt of a certified copy of the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case