SHANTI vs THE STATE OF HARYANA STATE OF HARYANA SECRETARY (HOME) — Crl.A. No. 171/2010

Case under Section II-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010180392008

Filing Date

04-Jul-2008

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 171/2010

Diary Number

18039/2008

Order Date

19-Sep-2018

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 04-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHANTI

    Adv. SANJEEV MALHOTRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HARYANA STATE OF HARYANA SECRETARY (HOME)

    Adv. BALBIR SINGH GUPTA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) VISHWA PAL SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Sep-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 19-Sep-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

  4. 13-Aug-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 13-Aug-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer

  6. 07-May-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 07-May-2018

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer

  8. 28-Mar-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 28-Mar-2018

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer

  10. 20-Feb-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 20-Feb-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Registrar (J) - IV

  12. 12-Jan-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 12-Jan-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Registrar (J) - IV

  14. 15-Nov-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 15-Nov-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 07-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 18-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 31-Mar-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 06-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 01-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 04-Jul-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 171/2010

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.A. No. 171/2010 — Shanti v. State of Haryana On September 19, 2018, the Supreme Court dismissed Shanti's criminal appeal for non-prosecution. The appellant's counsel informed the court that his client was not providing instructions despite repeated attempts to contact her. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar ordered the dismissal based on this lack of prosecution by the appellant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case