SANKAR MONDAL vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS — C.A. No. 1924/2010
Case under Section XVI. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010179842009
Filing Date
22-Jun-2009
Registration No
C.A. No. 1924/2010
Diary Number
17984/2009
Order Date
15-Feb-2022
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANKAR MONDAL
Adv. RANJAN MUKHERJEE
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS
Adv. PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-7] PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-6] PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-5] PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-4] PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-3] PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-2] PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1] CHANCHAL KUMAR GANGULI PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Feb-2022
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Feb-2022
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh
-
08-Feb-2022
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Feb-2022
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh
-
29-Jan-2020
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Jan-2020
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Subhash Reddy
-
28-Jan-2020
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Subhash Reddy
-
23-Jan-2020
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jan-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Apr-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Dec-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Oct-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Jun-2009
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 1924/2010
Case Summary: Sankar Mondal v. The State of West Bengal (C.A. No. 001924/2010) The Supreme Court dismissed Sankar Mondal's appeal on February 15, 2022. Mondal had applied for a Sub-Assistant Engineer position in 1999, cleared medical fitness, but his appointment was blocked due to non-receipt of a police verification report. After waiting seven years, he filed an Original Application before the State Administrative Tribunal in 2006, which was rejected in 2008 for lack of prior representation. The Calcutta High Court dismissed his challenge in 2008, citing his alleged Bangladesh nationality. The Supreme Court held that recruitment processes require closure and candidates cannot seek redressal indefinitely after such lengthy delays. The Court ruled that waiting seven years before filing a petition itself disqualified the appeal, regardless of the merits concerning the police verification report. The appeal was dismissed without examining the factual accuracy of the police verification findings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts