PURSHOTTAM CHOPRA vs STATE(GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) HOME SECRETARY — Crl.A. No. 194 - 195/2012

Case under Section II-D. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010179392011

Filing Date

07-Jun-2011

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 194 - 195/2012

Diary Number

17939/2011

Order Date

07-Jan-2020

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2020 INSC 5

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-D

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PURSHOTTAM CHOPRA

    Adv. MILIND KUMAR[P-1] JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA[P-2]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE(GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) HOME SECRETARY

    Adv. B. V. BALARAM DAS (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-1] DEVENDRA SINGH MEHRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Jan-2020

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 07-Jan-2020

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 07-Jan-2020

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari

  5. 01-Oct-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 01-Oct-2019

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari

  7. 26-Sep-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 26-Sep-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari

  9. 25-Sep-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 25-Sep-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari

  11. 17-Sep-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari

  12. 12-Sep-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari

  13. 22-Apr-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 24-Jan-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 24-Jan-2019

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Subhash Reddy

  16. 24-Jan-2019

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Subhash Reddy

  17. 24-Jan-2019

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Subhash Reddy

  18. 23-Jan-2019

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Subhash Reddy

  19. 22-Jan-2019

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Subhash Reddy

  20. 03-Jan-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 03-Jan-2019

    IA

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer

  22. 14-Nov-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 14-Nov-2017

    IA

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J. Chelameswar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer

  24. 07-Nov-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 19-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 19-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 20-Apr-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 20-Apr-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 20-Apr-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 23-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 08-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 16-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 25-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  34. 23-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  35. 08-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  36. 07-Jun-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 194 - 195/2012

  37. [ 2020 INSC 5 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Purshottam Chopra v. State (Crl.A. 194-195/2012) The Supreme Court of India upheld the conviction of two appellants (Purshottam Chopra and Suresh) for murder under Section 302/34 IPC for setting victim Sher Singh on fire in December 1997. The conviction was based primarily on two dying declarations: one recorded by Dr. Sushma in the MLC upon hospital admission, and another recorded by SI Rajesh Kumar at the hospital, wherein the victim identified both appellants as assailants who poured kerosene and set him ablaze. The Court rejected challenges regarding the 100% burn injuries, lack of magistrate involvement, and alleged lack of motive, affirming that dying declarations can constitute sole basis for conviction when they inspire judicial confidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case