SANTOSH VAID vs UTTAM CHAND — C.A. No. 7814/2013

Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Sclsc Disposed.

Sclsc Disposed

CNR: SCIN010178872012

Filing Date

21-May-2012

Registration No

C.A. No. 7814/2013

Diary Number

17887/2012

Order Date

02-Mar-2023

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed as withdrawn

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XIV-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANTOSH VAID

    Adv. KARANJAWALA & CO.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UTTAM CHAND

    Adv. NIDHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Mar-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 02-Mar-2023

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar

  4. 12-Aug-2015
  5. 12-Aug-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  6. 12-Aug-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  7. 12-Aug-2015
  8. 13-May-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 13-May-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 19-Jan-2015
  11. 25-Nov-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 25-Nov-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 25-Nov-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 03-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 29-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 22-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 03-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 29-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 08-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 15-Mar-2013
  21. 12-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 22-Jan-2013
  23. 18-Jan-2013
  24. 08-Jan-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 05-Dec-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 04-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 13-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 21-May-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 7814/2013

  29. 09-May-2012
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 007814/2013 (Santosh Vaid v. Uttam Chand) On 2nd March 2023, the Supreme Court dismissed Civil Appeals No. 7814/2013, 7817/2013, and 7818/2013 as withdrawn. Appellant's counsel stated the appeals had become infructuous with the passage of time and sought permission to withdraw them. The Court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed all pending applications accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case