THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HOME DEPARTMENT SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE vs RAJU @ RAJESH — Crl.A. No. 674/2012

Case under Section II-E. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010177622010

Filing Date

07-Jun-2010

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 674/2012

Diary Number

17762/2010

Order Date

24-Aug-2017

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-E

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HOME DEPARTMENT SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE

    Adv. C. D. SINGH (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJU @ RAJESH

    Adv. KHAITAN & CO.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Aug-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 24-Aug-2017

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Ramana and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prafulla C. Pant

  4. 23-Aug-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 23-Aug-2017

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Ramana and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prafulla C. Pant

  6. 22-Aug-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 22-Aug-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 14-Jul-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 14-Jul-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 13-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 23-Mar-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 02-Mar-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 10-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 05-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 05-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 11-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 08-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 07-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 16-Dec-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 07-Jun-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 674/2012

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Criminal Appeal No. 674/2012 The Supreme Court dismissed the State of Madhya Pradesh's appeal against the High Court's acquittal of accused Raju @ Rajesh in a 1996 kidnapping case involving minor Juhi. The Court upheld the acquittal, finding the prosecution failed to establish a complete chain of evidence: recovered bones could not conclusively identify the victim, handwriting analysis of an alleged confession letter was inconclusive with suspicious one-year delays, and the key prosecution witness was declared hostile. The appeals were dismissed on 24 August 2017. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case