GOVT OF INDIA TH:SECY . vs RAVI PRAKASH GUPTA . — SLP(C) No. 14889/2009

Case under Section I-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010176522009

Filing Date

16-Jun-2009

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 14889/2009

Diary Number

17652/2009

Order Date

14-Jul-2011

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section I-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVT OF INDIA TH:SECY .

    Adv. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAVI PRAKASH GUPTA .

    Adv. BINU TAMTA A. SUMATHI SAMIR ALI KHAN RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 13-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 25-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 11-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 28-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 09-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 21-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 06-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 07-Jul-2010

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 07-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 07-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 04-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 03-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 14-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 06-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 04-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 03-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 01-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 27-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 20-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 03-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 20-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 16-Jun-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 14889/2009

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: On July 14, 2011, the Supreme Court dismissed the contempt petition filed by Ravi Prakash Gupta, holding that his grievance regarding cadre allotment in Chhattisgarh should be pursued before the appropriate authority, not through contempt proceedings. The Court also found no substance in his claim for back wages, as prior orders had only directed notional pay fixation with actual salary from his actual joining date. The Court dismissed both the contempt petition and I.A. No. 5/2010 without prejudice to pursuing remedies before competent forums. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case