GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI vs M/S BSK REALTORS LLP — C.A. No. 6604/2024

Case under Land Acquisition and Requisition : Challenge to Land Acquisition, Lapsing of Acquisition, De-reservation, Requisition and De-requisition of Property and Others Section XIV-A. Status: DISPOSED.

CNR: SCIN010176232021

DISPOSED

Filing Date

02-Aug-2021

Registration No

C.A. No. 6604/2024

Diary Number

17623/2021

Order Date

17-May-2024

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2024 INSC 455

Disposal Type

Leave Granted & Disposed off

Data as of 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition and Requisition : Challenge to land acquisition, lapsing of acquisition, de-reservation, requisition and de-requisition of property and others Section XIV-A

Petitioner(s)

GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI

Adv. SUJEETA SRIVASTAVA

Respondent(s)

M/S BSK REALTORS LLP

Adv. PANKAJ BHAGAT[R-1] NITIN MISHRA[R-2]

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN

17-May-2024

Fixed Date by Court

23-Nov-2023

Fixed Date by Court

22-Nov-2023

Fixed Date by Court

09-Nov-2023

Fixed Date by Court

08-Nov-2023

Fixed Date by Court

Orders in this case

[ 2024 INSC 455 ] Judgement - of Main Case
23-Feb-2017 ROP
23-Feb-2017 Office Report
23-Feb-2017 ROP
13-Feb-2017 ROP
13-Feb-2017 Office Report
13-Feb-2017 ROP
16-Nov-2016 ROP
16-Nov-2016 ROP
09-Nov-2016 ROP
09-Nov-2016 ROP
31-Aug-2016 ROP
31-Aug-2016 ROP
11-Sep-2015 ROP
11-Sep-2015 Office Report
11-Sep-2015 ROP
View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Government of NCT of Delhi v. M/S BSK Realtors LLP (2024 INSC 455) The Supreme Court addressed a complex batch of 81+ cases involving conflicting judicial interpretations of land acquisition lapse provisions. The Court held that while the doctrine of merger and res judicata normally apply, exceptional circumstances—involving massive public infrastructure projects and contradictory precedents—justified invoking Article 142 of the Constitution to balance private landowner interests against paramount public interest. For Groups A and B.1 cases, the Court extended acquisition deadlines by one year from August 2024, dispensed with certain statutory requirements, and directed re-acquisition proceedings; Group B.2 cases were dismissed as infructuous; and Group E cases involving fraud allegations were remitted to the High Court for factual inquiry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Supreme Court of India All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case