DEEPAK KUMAR vs STATE OF U.P. — Crl.A. No. 2580/2026

Case under 1502Rb-criminal Law : Offences Against Children, Including the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act,2012(slps Arising Out of Regular Bail Applications, Suspension of Sentence.) Section II. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010175802026

Filing Date

21-Mar-2026

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 2580/2026

Diary Number

17580/2026

Order Date

18-May-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Leave Granted & Allowed

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

1502RB-Criminal Law : Offences against children, including the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act,2012(SLPs arising out of Regular Bail applications, suspension of sentence.) Section II

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEEPAK KUMAR

    Adv. DIVYESH PRATAP SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P.

    Adv. YASHARTH KANT[R-1] CHAND QURESHI[R-2]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-May-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 18-May-2026

    Mention Memo

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vipul M. Pancholi

  4. 07-May-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 09-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 21-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 2580/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Deepak Kumar v. State of U.P. Outcome: The Supreme Court allowed Deepak Kumar's criminal appeal and granted him bail. The Court set aside the Allahabad High Court's April 1, 2025 order rejecting his bail plea in Crime No. 31/2023 (false promise of marriage case). Kumar will be released on bail with terms and conditions to be determined by the trial court. Key Factors: The Court considered that the alleged physical relationship occurred in 2017 when the victim was a minor, but the FIR was filed only in 2023 after Kumar married another woman. Kumar had been incarcerated since August 25, 2023. Despite the State's argument that trial was nearing conclusion, the Court found Kumar entitled to bail based on the nature of allegations and lengthy incarceration pending trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case