GIAN CHAND vs PANCHAYATI AKHARA MAHANT PURAN DASS JOINT SECRETARY OF AKHARA — C.A. No. 8265/2017

Case under Land Laws, Agricultural Tenancy, Land Revenue : Land Ceiling Laws Including Urban Land Ceiling Act, Repeal Act and State Land Ceiling Laws and Consolidation Laws Section IV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010175202010

Filing Date

01-Jun-2010

Registration No

C.A. No. 8265/2017

Diary Number

17520/2010

Order Date

21-Jan-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Laws, Agricultural tenancy, Land Revenue : Land Ceiling Laws including Urban Land Ceiling Act, Repeal Act and State Land Ceiling Laws and consolidation laws Section IV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GIAN CHAND

    Adv. ROHIT KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PANCHAYATI AKHARA MAHANT PURAN DASS JOINT SECRETARY OF AKHARA

    Adv. DEEPAK GOEL S. L. ANEJA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) NARESH BAKSHI SAMAR VIJAY SINGH[R-2] SAMAR VIJAY SINGH[R-3] SAMAR VIJAY SINGH[R-4] GOLDY GOYAL[R-6]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Jan-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 21-Jan-2026

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Aradhe

  4. 21-Jan-2026

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan

  5. 15-Jan-2026

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan

  6. 18-May-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 18-May-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Registrar (Court & Building)

  8. 05-Apr-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 05-Apr-2023

    Ordinary

    Registrar (Jud. Listing)

  10. 02-Mar-2021

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 02-Mar-2021

    IA

    Registrar

  12. 11-May-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 11-May-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 04-May-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 04-May-2017

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 04-May-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 05-Jan-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 05-Jan-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 05-Jan-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 05-Nov-2014

    ROPView PDF

  21. 05-Nov-2014

    ROPView PDF

  22. 08-Aug-2014

    ROPView PDF

  23. 22-Apr-2014

    ROPView PDF

  24. 28-Jan-2014

    ROPView PDF

  25. 21-Oct-2013

    ROPView PDF

  26. 14-Aug-2013

    ROPView PDF

  27. 01-Jul-2013

    ROPView PDF

  28. 11-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 18-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 07-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 06-Nov-2012

    ROPView PDF

  32. 06-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 11-May-2012

    ROPView PDF

  34. 07-May-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  35. 30-Mar-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  36. 16-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  37. 12-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  38. 30-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  39. 01-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  40. 19-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  41. 19-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  42. 11-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  43. 29-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  44. 17-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  45. 25-Feb-2011

    ROPView PDF

  46. 17-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  47. 08-Nov-2010

    ROPView PDF

  48. 27-Sep-2010

    ROPView PDF

  49. 20-Sep-2010

    ROPView PDF

  50. 16-Aug-2010

    ROPView PDF

  51. 16-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  52. 01-Jun-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 8265/2017

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Gian Chand v. Panchayati Akhara (C.A. No. 8265/2017) The Supreme Court dismissed all three appeals on January 21, 2026, upholding that the 1961 Collector's order declaring the Akhara's land as surplus was void (issued without notice). The Court confirmed the plaintiff-Akhara's declaratory relief but reserved liberty for the plaintiff to file a separate suit for possession, as defendants remain in actual possession as tenants. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case