M/S KOTA DALL MILL vs NATIONAL AGRICULTURE COOPERATIVE MARKETING FEDERATION OF INDIA LIMITED (NAFED) — SLP(C) No. 11197/2026

Case under Tenders/licenses/leases : Tenders/licenses/leases Invited by Union/ Ut’s/ Central Public Sector Undertakings, Including Cancellation/award of Tenders. Section XIV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010174792026

Filing Date

20-Mar-2026

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 11197/2026

Diary Number

17479/2026

Order Date

01-Apr-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Tenders/licenses/leases : Tenders/licenses/leases invited by Union/ UT’s/ Central public sector undertakings, including cancellation/award of tenders. Section XIV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S KOTA DALL MILL

    Adv. AAKASH NANDOLIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NATIONAL AGRICULTURE COOPERATIVE MARKETING FEDERATION OF INDIA LIMITED (NAFED)

    Adv. CHITRANSHUL A. SINHA [caveat]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 20-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 11197/2026

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: M/S KOTA DALL MILL v. NAFED (SLP(C) No. 11197/2026) Outcome: The Supreme Court disposed of Kota Dall Mill's petition, upholding the High Court's decision on the Uttar Pradesh manufacturing unit requirement (Clause A1). However, the Court held that tender Clause A(12)—requiring bidders to have no pending legal/criminal cases—shall not bar the petitioner's future tender participation, since an arbitral tribunal awarded the petitioner and Section 34 proceedings remain pending before Lucknow Commercial Court. Next Steps: A related petition by Rasi Nutri Foods (SLP No. 11159/2026) was kept pending and re-listed for 6th April 2026 to establish whether other qualified bidders lack Uttar Pradesh manufacturing units; the A(12) clause challenge remains open for decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case