THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HOME DEPARTMENT SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE vs JUGGAN @ SABIR KHAN — Crl.A. No. 1647/2013
Case under 1511Comp-criminal Law : Criminal Matters Other Than Covered by the Aforesaid Categories(matters Filed by the State Government/ Complainant Against Acquittals or Reduction of Sentence.) Section II-E. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010173162012
Filing Date
15-May-2012
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 1647/2013
Diary Number
17316/2012
Order Date
03-Oct-2024
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HOME DEPARTMENT SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE
Adv. YASHRAJ SINGH BUNDELA [P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.JUGGAN @ SABIR KHAN
Adv. M. P. SHORAWALA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) PRAVEEN SWARUP[R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Oct-2024
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Oct-2024
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra
-
05-Sep-2024
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Sep-2024
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra
-
04-Sep-2024
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Sep-2024
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra
-
25-Feb-2022
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Feb-2022
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath
-
18-Feb-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Dec-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Dec-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Oct-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Oct-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Aug-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Aug-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Jul-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jul-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-May-2012
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1647/2013
Summary of Crl.A. No. 001647/2013 The Supreme Court dismissed the State of Madhya Pradesh's appeal on October 3, 2024, upholding the High Court's acquittal of Juggan @ Sabir Khan. The respondent was originally convicted of murder (IPC §302) for killing his wife within three months of marriage allegedly for dowry, but the High Court acquitted him due to significant discrepancies between two dying declarations, the absence of a key witness's examination, and questions about evidence authenticity. The Court refused to interfere, noting the respondent had already served approximately 11 years imprisonment before acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts