SOUTHERN STATES HOME GUARDS WELFARE ASSOCIATION vs THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE / DIRECTOR OF CIVIL DEFENCE AND ADDL. CMT. GENERAL — SLP(C) No. 18430/2026
Case under Service Laws : Appointment, Compassionate Appointment, Temporary Appointment, Recruitment,probation and Confirmation, Suspension, Reduction in Rank, Termination, Dismissal, Removal, Retirement, Disciplinary Proceedings Against Employees Section XII. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010172702026
Filing Date
19-Mar-2026
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 18430/2026
Diary Number
17270/2026
Order Date
20-May-2026
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Delay Condoned and matter dismissed(including all pending Ias)
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SOUTHERN STATES HOME GUARDS WELFARE ASSOCIATION
Adv. RANJAY KUMAR DUBEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE / DIRECTOR OF CIVIL DEFENCE AND ADDL. CMT. GENERAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-May-2026
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-May-2026
Fresh
Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vipul M. Pancholi
-
13-May-2026
Fresh
Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Joymalya Bagchi
-
06-May-2026
Fresh
Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Joymalya Bagchi
-
29-Apr-2026
Fresh
Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Joymalya Bagchi
-
17-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 18430/2026
Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 018430/2026 On 20-05-2026, the Supreme Court heard the Special Leave Petitions filed by the Southern States Home Guards Welfare Association against the Additional Director General of Police and others, arising from a High Court judgment dated 18-03-2024. The Court granted permission to file the petitions and condoned the delay in filing. However, the Court dismissed all Special Leave Petitions on the ground that the petitioners and the Association were not parties before the High Court and therefore lack *locus standi* to approach the Supreme Court. All pending applications were closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts