THE COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX vs M/S. RAMALEELA DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED M.D. — C.A. No. 5455/2013

Case under Direct Taxation : Income Tax Act, 1961, Wealth Tax Act, 1957, Gift Tax Act, 1958, Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940, Business Profit Tax Act, 1947 [Other Than Matters Covered by Categories 1602-1605] Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010172682012

Filing Date

15-May-2012

Registration No

C.A. No. 5455/2013

Diary Number

17268/2012

Order Date

12-Feb-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Direct Taxation : Income Tax Act, 1961, Wealth Tax Act, 1957, Gift Tax Act, 1958, Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940, Business Profit Tax Act, 1947 [other than matters covered by categories 1602-1605] Section XII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX

    Adv. RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S. RAMALEELA DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED M.D.

    Adv. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Feb-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 12-Feb-2026

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vijay Bishnoi

  4. 19-Jul-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 27-Jul-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 27-Jul-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 27-Jul-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 08-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 15-May-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 5455/2013

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Civil Appeal No. 5455/2013 The Supreme Court disposed of the Wealth Tax Commissioner's appeal against M/S. Ramaleela Developers Private Limited as "not pressed" on February 12, 2026, after the appellant's counsel argued the amount at stake (₹20,22,129) fell below the threshold limit for Supreme Court jurisdiction. The Court disposed of the appeal while leaving the question of law open, and all pending applications were also disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case