M.KRISHNAMURTHY . vs B.MANJULA . — SLP(C) No. 17169/2009

Case under Section IV-C. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010172672009

Filing Date

08-Jun-2009

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 17169/2009

Diary Number

17267/2009

Order Date

04-Nov-2011

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV-C

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M.KRISHNAMURTHY .

    Adv. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.B.MANJULA .

    Adv. S. SRINIVASAN (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 30-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 29-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 18-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 11-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 28-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 14-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 16-Dec-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 26-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 22-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 17-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 13-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 09-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 23-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 06-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 10-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 08-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 19-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 07-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 08-Jun-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 17169/2009

  22. 05-Jun-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 01-Jun-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 24-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: On 04/11/2011, the Supreme Court heard SLP(C) No. 8924/2009 (B. Manjula v. M. Krishnamurthy), challenging a Karnataka High Court order dated 24/03/2009. The petitioner's counsel informed the court she had instructions not to press the petition. The Court accordingly dismissed the special leave petition as not pressed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case