PRAMOD vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — MA 1084/2026

Case under Housing and Building-municipal Laws-housing and Building Permits, Slums Rehabilitation, Demolition, Encroachment/ Removal of Encroachment, Sealing and Urban Planning : Housing and Building- Matters Relating to Municipal Laws, Housing and Building Permits, Slums Rehabilitation, Demolition, Encroachment/ Removal of Encroachment, Sealing and Urban Planning (Other Than Rera) Section IX. Status: DISPOSED.

CNR: SCIN010171382026

DISPOSED

Filing Date

19-Mar-2026

Registration No

MA 1084/2026

Diary Number

17138/2026

Order Date

10-Apr-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Data as of 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Housing and Building-Municipal Laws-Housing and building permits, slums rehabilitation, demolition, encroachment/ removal of encroachment, sealing and urban planning : Housing and Building- matters relating to Municipal Laws, housing and building permits, slums rehabilitation, demolition, encroachment/ removal of encroachment, sealing and urban planning (other than RERA) Section IX

Petitioner(s)

PRAMOD

Adv. PRAGYA BAGHEL

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Adv. AADITYA ANIRUDDHA PANDE[R-1] SHIVAJI M. JADHAV[R-6] AADITYA ANIRUDDHA PANDE[R-1]

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JOYMALYA BAGCHI and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI

10-Apr-2026

Fixed Date by Court

24-Mar-2026

Mention Memo

Orders

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MA 1084/2026 – Pramod v. The State of Maharashtra The Supreme Court heard a miscellaneous application arising from a land dispute in Shegaon, Maharashtra. The Court clarified its previous order (dated 17.02.2026) by directing that eligible applicant-shop owners be offered shops in a completed Municipal Council commercial complex at Gandhi Chowk (425 meters from the disputed site) on ownership basis, at par with other shop owners. Applicants refusing the offered shops retain liberty to pursue enhanced compensation claims under law. The applicants were granted two weeks to vacate and handover the disputed premises. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Supreme Court of India All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case