RAJIV KUMAR vs BCI STAFF COLONY RESIDENTIAL WELFARE ASSOCIATION THRU ITS PRESIDENT SHRI S.P. KAUSHIK — C.A. No. 10128/2011

Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010171312010

Filing Date

26-May-2010

Registration No

C.A. No. 10128/2011

Diary Number

17131/2010

Order Date

27-Apr-2023

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2023 INSC 439

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJIV KUMAR

    Adv. SIBO SANKAR MISHRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BCI STAFF COLONY RESIDENTIAL WELFARE ASSOCIATION THRU ITS PRESIDENT SHRI S.P. KAUSHIK

    Adv. RAKHI RAY GAGAN GUPTA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) RAVI PRAKASH MEHROTRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) J S WAD AND CO[Caveat] JOGY SCARIA[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Apr-2023

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 27-Apr-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 27-Apr-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Bela M. Trivedi

  5. 19-Apr-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Bela M. Trivedi

  6. 13-Mar-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath

  7. 03-Mar-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath

  8. 03-Feb-2023

    Mention Memo

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath

  9. 03-Dec-2018

    IA

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph

  10. 25-Jan-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Registrar (J) - II

  11. 19-Jan-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Registrar (J) - II

  12. 28-Nov-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 09-Dec-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 09-Dec-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 09-Dec-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 29-Nov-2016

    ROPView PDF

  17. 29-Nov-2016

    ROPView PDF

  18. 08-Aug-2016

    ROPView PDF

  19. 08-Aug-2016

    ROPView PDF

  20. 01-Aug-2016

    ROPView PDF

  21. 01-Aug-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  22. 01-Aug-2016

    ROPView PDF

  23. 11-Jul-2016

    ROPView PDF

  24. 11-Jul-2016

    ROPView PDF

  25. 12-May-2016

    ROPView PDF

  26. 12-May-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  27. 12-May-2016

    ROPView PDF

  28. 09-May-2016

    ROPView PDF

  29. 09-May-2016

    ROPView PDF

  30. 05-May-2016

    ROPView PDF

  31. 05-May-2016

    ROPView PDF

  32. 17-Nov-2015

    ROPView PDF

  33. 17-Nov-2015

    ROPView PDF

  34. 04-Nov-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  35. 30-Oct-2015

    ROPView PDF

  36. 21-Nov-2011

    ROPView PDF

  37. 21-Oct-2011

    ROPView PDF

  38. 29-Aug-2011

    ROPView PDF

  39. 08-Aug-2011

    ROPView PDF

  40. 18-Jul-2011

    ROPView PDF

  41. 04-Jul-2011

    ROPView PDF

  42. 04-Apr-2011

    ROPView PDF

  43. 04-Apr-2011

    ROPView PDF

  44. 14-Mar-2011

    ROPView PDF

  45. 14-Feb-2011

    ROPView PDF

  46. 19-Oct-2010

    ROPView PDF

  47. 13-Sep-2010

    ROPView PDF

  48. 26-May-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 10128/2011

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 010128/2011 - Rajiv Kumar v. BCI Staff Colony Residential Welfare Association The Supreme Court dismissed both appeals, upholding the High Court's decision to set aside a property auction. The court found the auction procedure fundamentally defective because: (1) no professional valuation or reserve price was disclosed before bidding despite statutory requirements, (2) only one bid was received (Rs.2.84 crore), eliminating competitive bidding essential to maximize property value, and (3) the successful bidder failed to comply with mandatory payment and bank guarantee conditions. The court ordered refund of deposited amounts with 8% interest and directed fresh auction proceedings to achieve optimal property value. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case