PASCHIM PETROCHEM LIMITED THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR GANPATBHAI MELABHAI PARMAR vs AUTHD.OFFICER KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. — C.A. No. 7149/2016

Case under Company Law, Sick Industries Including Disinvestment : Company Law, Sick Industries Including Disinvestment Section III-B. Status: Pending.

Pending

CNR: SCIN010171142011

Filing Date

25-May-2011

Registration No

C.A. No. 7149/2016

Diary Number

17114/2011

Order Date

02-Aug-2018

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Company Law, Sick Industries including Disinvestment : Company Law, Sick Industries including Disinvestment Section III-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PASCHIM PETROCHEM LIMITED THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR GANPATBHAI MELABHAI PARMAR

    Adv. CHIRAG M. SHROFF

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AUTHD.OFFICER KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD.

    Adv. E. C. AGRAWALA

Case History

  1. 02-Aug-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  2. 02-Aug-2018

    Ordinary

    Registrar (A-J)

  3. 29-Jun-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 29-Jun-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 11-Apr-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 11-Apr-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 05-Apr-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 05-Apr-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 29-Jan-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 29-Jan-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 18-Jan-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 18-Jan-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 08-Jul-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 31-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 25-May-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 7149/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Civil Appeal No. 7149/2016 heard on 02-08-2018, the Supreme Court Registrar found that counsel for both Paschim Petrochem Limited and the Authorized Officer of Kotak Mahindra Bank failed to file the statement of case within the statutory period despite complete service. The Court directed that the matters be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case