SATISH KUMAR vs KRISHAN LAL . — SLP(C) No. 18799/2010

Case under Section I-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010170932010

Filing Date

26-May-2010

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 18799/2010

Diary Number

17093/2010

Order Date

29-Oct-2013

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section I-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SATISH KUMAR

    Adv. MRS. VIPIN GUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KRISHAN LAL .

    Adv. RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON MEERA AGARWAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 02-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 17-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 18-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 15-Jan-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 22-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 06-Sep-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 20-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 04-May-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 29-Mar-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 14-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 09-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 24-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 18-Oct-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 12-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 08-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 06-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 20-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 10-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 26-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 06-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 25-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 08-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 26-May-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 18799/2010

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In SLP(C) No. 18799/2010, the Supreme Court heard Satish Kumar's petition challenging a Punjab & Haryana High Court order dated 28/08/2007. On 29/10/2013, a bench of Justice H.L. Dattu and Justice Ranjan Gogoi heard arguments from both parties. The Court condoned the delay in filing the Special Leave to Petition and dismissed the petition entirely. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case