ANVERSINH @ KIRANSINH FATESINH ZALA vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF HOME SECRETARIAT LAW SECRETARY SECRETARY — Crl.A. No. 1919/2010
Case under Section II-E. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010170032010
Filing Date
25-May-2010
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 1919/2010
Diary Number
17003/2010
Order Date
12-Jan-2021
Document Type
Judgement - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2021 INSC 16
Disposal Type
Partly Allowed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANVERSINH @ KIRANSINH FATESINH ZALA
Adv. NARESH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF HOME SECRETARIAT LAW SECRETARY SECRETARY
Adv. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Jan-2021
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Jan-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Jan-2021
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Ramana, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose
-
02-Sep-2020
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Sep-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Jul-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Mar-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-May-2010
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1919/2010
-
[ 2021 INSC 16 ]
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
Case Summary: Anversinh @ Kiransinh Fatesinh Zala v. State of Gujarat Supreme Court Decision (12.01.2021): The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of appellant Anversinh under IPC Sections 363 and 366 (kidnapping for marriage), rejecting his argument that a consensual love affair negates kidnapping charges against a minor. The court held that a minor's consent is legally immaterial under Section 361 IPC—guardians hold exclusive authority over decisions concerning a minor's physical safety. However, the court reduced his sentence from five years to time already served, considering his young age (18-19 at incident), the non-violent nature of the offense, 22+ years elapsed since the incident, low recidivism risk, and equal social status between parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts