N.RAJENDRAN vs S.VALLI — C.A. No. 3293/2012
Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010167702010
Filing Date
21-May-2010
Registration No
C.A. No. 3293/2012
Diary Number
16770/2010
Order Date
03-Feb-2022
Document Type
Judgement - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2022 INSC 140
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.N.RAJENDRAN
Adv. RAJESH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.S.VALLI
Adv. GAUTAM NARAYAN (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [Caveat]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Feb-2022
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Feb-2022
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Feb-2022
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy
-
02-Feb-2022
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Feb-2022
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy
-
01-Feb-2022
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Feb-2022
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy
-
19-Jan-2022
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Jan-2022
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
-
17-Nov-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-May-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-May-2015
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-May-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Feb-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Mar-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Mar-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Oct-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Feb-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-May-2010
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 3293/2012
Case Summary: N. Rajendran v. S. Valli (C.A. No. 003293/2012) The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court's reversal of a Family Court divorce decree based on cruelty. Finding no grounds for dissolution under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act (the wife's departure during pregnancy was natural, not cruel), the Court upheld the marriage. However, after 22+ years of separation with an intervening marriage and child, the Court exercised Article 142 powers to dissolve the marriage based on irretrievable breakdown, imposing Rs. 20 lakh compensation and Rs. 7,000/month maintenance on the appellant husband. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts