C.I.T,PUNE vs KRISHNA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. — C.A. No. 6957/2012
Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010167522010
Filing Date
21-May-2010
Registration No
C.A. No. 6957/2012
Diary Number
16752/2010
Order Date
25-Sep-2012
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.C.I.T,PUNE
Respondent(s)
-
1.KRISHNA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Sep-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Sep-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Sep-2012
ROPView PDF
-
03-Aug-2012
ROPView PDF
-
09-Jul-2012
ROPView PDF
-
04-Jul-2012
ROPView PDF
-
09-May-2012
ROPView PDF
-
16-Apr-2012
ROPView PDF
-
09-Apr-2012
ROPView PDF
-
02-Apr-2012
ROPView PDF
-
23-Mar-2012
ROPView PDF
-
16-Mar-2012
ROPView PDF
-
16-Mar-2012
ROPView PDF
-
12-Mar-2012
ROPView PDF
-
02-Mar-2012
ROPView PDF
-
02-Mar-2012
ROPView PDF
-
27-Feb-2012
ROPView PDF
-
23-Feb-2012
ROPView PDF
-
08-Feb-2012
ROPView PDF
-
03-Feb-2012
ROPView PDF
-
30-Jan-2012
ROPView PDF
-
27-Jan-2012
ROPView PDF
-
20-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jan-2012
ROPView PDF
-
06-Jan-2012
ROPView PDF
-
02-Jan-2012
ROPView PDF
-
02-Jan-2012
ROPView PDF
-
12-Dec-2011
ROPView PDF
-
09-Dec-2011
ROPView PDF
-
09-Dec-2011
ROPView PDF
-
09-Dec-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Nov-2011
ROPView PDF
-
28-Nov-2011
ROPView PDF
-
16-Nov-2011
ROPView PDF
-
11-Nov-2011
ROPView PDF
-
11-Nov-2011
ROPView PDF
-
11-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Nov-2011
ROPView PDF
-
08-Nov-2011
ROPView PDF
-
30-Sep-2011
ROPView PDF
-
21-Sep-2011
ROPView PDF
-
19-Sep-2011
ROPView PDF
-
16-Sep-2011
ROPView PDF
-
16-Sep-2011
ROPView PDF
-
12-Sep-2011
ROPView PDF
-
09-Sep-2011
ROPView PDF
-
30-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
29-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
19-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
16-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
11-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
08-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
08-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
08-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
08-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
04-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
04-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
01-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
01-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
27-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
18-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
18-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
18-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
15-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
14-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
06-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
06-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
06-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
04-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
13-May-2011
ROPView PDF
-
09-May-2011
ROPView PDF
-
05-May-2011
ROPView PDF
-
25-Apr-2011
ROPView PDF
-
20-Apr-2011
ROPView PDF
-
15-Apr-2011
ROPView PDF
-
15-Apr-2011
ROPView PDF
-
01-Apr-2011
ROPView PDF
-
01-Apr-2011
ROPView PDF
-
01-Apr-2011
ROPView PDF
-
01-Apr-2011
ROPView PDF
-
11-Mar-2011
ROPView PDF
-
08-Mar-2011
ROPView PDF
-
11-Feb-2011
ROPView PDF
-
02-Feb-2011
ROPView PDF
-
28-Jan-2011
ROPView PDF
-
14-Jan-2011
ROPView PDF
-
16-Dec-2010
ROPView PDF
-
10-Dec-2010
ROPView PDF
-
22-Nov-2010
ROPView PDF
-
19-Nov-2010
ROPView PDF
-
08-Oct-2010
ROPView PDF
-
04-Oct-2010
ROPView PDF
-
17-Sep-2010
ROPView PDF
-
13-Sep-2010
ROPView PDF
-
30-Aug-2010
ROPView PDF
-
13-Aug-2010
ROPView PDF
-
16-Jul-2010
ROPView PDF
-
08-Jul-2010
ROPView PDF
-
08-Jul-2010
ROPView PDF
-
08-Jul-2010
ROPView PDF
-
05-Jul-2010
ROPView PDF
-
05-Jul-2010
ROPView PDF
-
21-May-2010
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 6957/2012
-
11-May-2010
ROPView PDF
-
07-May-2010
ROPView PDF
-
30-Apr-2010
ROPView PDF
-
26-Apr-2010
ROPView PDF
-
16-Apr-2010
ROPView PDF
-
09-Apr-2010
ROPView PDF
-
15-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
Case Summary: C.I.T., Pune v. Krishna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. Outcome: The Supreme Court remitted the case back to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for de novo reconsideration, disposing of all 44 consolidated civil appeals with no order as to costs. Key Issue: Whether the difference between fair market price and concessional price at which a cooperative sugar society sells sugar to its farmer-members should be taxable as "appropriation of profit." Direction: The CIT(A) was instructed to re-examine: (1) whether such concessional sales constitute established industry practice/custom; (2) if state government resolutions support the practice; (3) the basis for determining monthly sugar quantities for member sales; and (4) all questions of law and fact remain open for reconsideration, with liberty for both parties to produce relevant documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts