THE PRESIDENT, ROLLER SKATING FEDERATION OF INDIA vs ROLLER SKATING FEDERATION OF INDIA — T.P.(C) No. 925/2026

Case under Transfer Petitions : Civil Transfer Petitions Under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 Section I-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010165402026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

T.P.(C) No. 925/2026

Diary Number

16540/2026

Order Date

19-May-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Permission to File SLP/Appeal-allowed and matter dismissed(including all pending Ias)

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Transfer Petitions : Civil Transfer Petitions under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 Section I-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE PRESIDENT, ROLLER SKATING FEDERATION OF INDIA

    Adv. PRERNA MEHTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ROLLER SKATING FEDERATION OF INDIA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-May-2026

    Fresh

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vipul M. Pancholi

  3. 12-May-2026

    Fresh

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Joymalya Bagchi

  4. 05-May-2026

    Fresh

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Joymalya Bagchi

  5. 23-Apr-2026

    Fresh

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Joymalya Bagchi

  6. 08-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. T.P.(C) No. 925/2026

Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters

Lead case: T.P.(C) No. 1564 - 1566/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Supreme Court granted permission to file transfer petitions by Tulsi Ram Agarwal seeking to consolidate multiple writ petitions pending before different High Courts regarding his re-election as President of the Roller Skating Federation of India. However, the Court declined to transfer all matters to one High Court, finding the issues raised were not identical or overlapping. Instead, the Court directed the petitioner to approach the respective High Courts requesting early/out-of-turn adjudication. The transfer petitions were disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case