LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER-CUM-RDO vs N. VENKATARAMANA . — C.A. No. 2199/2001
Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010165372000
Filing Date
28-Sep-2000
Registration No
C.A. No. 2199/2001
Diary Number
16537/2000
Order Date
18-Feb-2009
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER-CUM-RDO
Adv. T. V. GEORGE
Respondent(s)
-
1.N. VENKATARAMANA .
Adv. A. T. M. SAMPATH (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
Case Summary On February 18, 2009, the Supreme Court allowed the Land Acquisition Officer's appeal, holding that the High Court erred in using a 20 square yard land sale (at Rs.50/sqyd) as comparable for determining compensation on approximately 10 acres of acquired land. The Court ruled that smaller land parcels cannot serve as exemplars for larger acquisitions under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and that post-notification sale deeds are inappropriate comparables. The High Court's judgment dated March 7, 2000 was set aside and the Reference Court's judgment from December 21, 1995 was restored, with no order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts