LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER-CUM-RDO vs N. VENKATARAMANA . — C.A. No. 2199/2001

Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010165372000

Filing Date

28-Sep-2000

Registration No

C.A. No. 2199/2001

Diary Number

16537/2000

Order Date

18-Feb-2009

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XIV-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER-CUM-RDO

    Adv. T. V. GEORGE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.N. VENKATARAMANA .

    Adv. A. T. M. SAMPATH (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 21-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 19-Mar-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 28-Sep-2000

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 2199/2001

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary On February 18, 2009, the Supreme Court allowed the Land Acquisition Officer's appeal, holding that the High Court erred in using a 20 square yard land sale (at Rs.50/sqyd) as comparable for determining compensation on approximately 10 acres of acquired land. The Court ruled that smaller land parcels cannot serve as exemplars for larger acquisitions under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and that post-notification sale deeds are inappropriate comparables. The High Court's judgment dated March 7, 2000 was set aside and the Reference Court's judgment from December 21, 1995 was restored, with no order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case