MRIDANG PHARMA PRIVATE LIMITED vs STATION HOUSE OFFICER — SLP(C) No. 11266/2026

Case under Banking : Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Debt Recovery by Banks, Financial Institutions, Cooperative Banks and Negotiable Instruments [Other Than Criminal Prosecution] Section XI. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010165302026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 11266/2026

Diary Number

16530/2026

Order Date

11-May-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Banking : Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, debt recovery by banks, financial institutions, cooperative banks and negotiable instruments [other than criminal prosecution] Section XI

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MRIDANG PHARMA PRIVATE LIMITED

    Adv. AVIRAL KASHYAP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATION HOUSE OFFICER

    Adv. ANINDITA MITRA [caveat]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 11-May-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Aradhe

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Aradhe

  6. 01-Apr-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 01-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 11266/2026

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Supreme Court dismissed Mridang Pharma Private Limited's Special Leave Petition challenging the Allahabad High Court's order dated 30-01-2026. The Court declined to interfere with the High Court's decision but reiterated its direction that the Debts Recovery Tribunal dispose of Securitization Application No. 843 of 2025 within two months. The Court directed parties to cooperate expeditiously without unnecessary adjournments, and disposed of all pending interlocutory applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case