SARVESH CHOPRA (D) THR.LRS. vs M/S. IRCON INTERNATIONAL LTD. — C.A. No. 7309/2013
Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010164832010
Filing Date
18-May-2010
Registration No
C.A. No. 7309/2013
Diary Number
16483/2010
Order Date
30-Aug-2013
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SARVESH CHOPRA (D) THR.LRS.
Adv. CHIRAG M. SHROFF
Respondent(s)
-
1.M/S. IRCON INTERNATIONAL LTD.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-May-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-May-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Feb-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Feb-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Sep-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Dec-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-May-2010
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 7309/2013
Case Summary: Sarvesh Chopra v. M/S. IRCON International Ltd (C.A. 7309/2013) Outcome: The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the orders of both the Single Judge and Division Bench of the Delhi High Court, and remanded the matter to the Single Judge for fresh consideration on merits as an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Key Issue: The Court found that both lower courts had incorrectly treated the appellant's challenge as one under Section 34 (challenging an award), when it was actually a challenge under Section 16(2) (challenging the arbitrator's jurisdiction), which requires examination under Section 37. Next Step: The Single Judge must reconsider whether the respondent validly discharged its liability through full and final settlement, examining the merits afresh without any opinion expressed by the Supreme Court on this substantive issue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts