MANISHA NIMESH MEHTA vs TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT BOARD — SLP(C) No. 13027/2026

Case under Banking : Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Debt Recovery by Banks, Financial Institutions, Cooperative Banks and Negotiable Instruments [Other Than Criminal Prosecution] Section IX. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010164542026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 13027/2026

Diary Number

16454/2026

Order Date

27-Apr-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Delay Condoned and matter dismissed(including all pending Ias)

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Banking : Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, debt recovery by banks, financial institutions, cooperative banks and negotiable instruments [other than criminal prosecution] Section IX

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANISHA NIMESH MEHTA

    Adv. CHAND QURESHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT BOARD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Mention Memo

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Vinod Chandran

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 13027/2026

Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters

Lead case: SLP(C) No. 15436/2026

PDF 1
View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petitions filed by Manisha Nimesh Mehta against the Technology Development Board, finding that the petitioner had committed abuse of process by repeatedly filing writ petitions on the same cause of action without disclosing earlier dismissals and related proceedings. The Court noted that the petitioner had previously filed and withdrawn similar petitions before the High Court and Supreme Court, and had filed multiple writ petitions expecting the Court to eventually agree with her contentions. While the delay in filing was condoned and no exemplary costs were imposed due to the petitioner's counsel's ill-health, the petitions were dismissed with all pending applications disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case