BIJENDER @ MANDAR vs THE STATE OF HARYANA STATE OF HARYANA SECRETARY (HOME) — Crl.A. No. 2438/2010

Case under Section II-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010164482010

Filing Date

18-May-2010

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 2438/2010

Diary Number

16448/2010

Order Date

08-Nov-2021

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2021 INSC 706

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BIJENDER @ MANDAR

    Adv. MUKUL KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HARYANA STATE OF HARYANA SECRETARY (HOME)

    Adv. MONIKA GUSAIN (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Nov-2021

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 08-Nov-2021

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 08-Nov-2021

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Hima Kohli

  5. 30-Sep-2021

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 30-Sep-2021

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Hima Kohli

  7. 29-Sep-2021

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 29-Sep-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 18-Feb-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 22-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 22-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 23-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 22-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 25-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 08-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 18-May-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 2438/2010

  17. [ 2021 INSC 706 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Bijender @ Mandar v. State of Haryana Court Decision: The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of all charges under Sections 392 and 397 IPC, reversing the conviction and sentences imposed by the Trial Court and High Court. The Court found the evidence insufficient to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, particularly noting that conviction rested solely on a disclosure statement lacking corroborative evidence despite key eyewitnesses turning hostile and denying the alleged robbery occurred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case