MEHTAB (D) BY LRS. vs ABDUL HAMID — SLP(C) No. 2492 - 2493/2011
Case under Section IX. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010164292010
Filing Date
18-May-2010
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 2492 - 2493/2011
Diary Number
16429/2010
Order Date
06-Nov-2017
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed as withdrawn
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MEHTAB (D) BY LRS.
Adv. ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA II[P-1] KIRAN BHARDWAJ[P-2] KIRAN BHARDWAJ[P-4] KIRAN BHARDWAJ[P-5] KIRAN BHARDWAJ[P-7] KIRAN BHARDWAJ[P-8]
Respondent(s)
-
1.ABDUL HAMID
Adv. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR[R-1] SATYA MITRA[R-1] SHEKHAR KUMAR[R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Nov-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Nov-2017
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel
-
01-Sep-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Sep-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Sep-2017
Auto Updated (Cmis)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer
-
28-Apr-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Apr-2017
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Apr-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Sep-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Sep-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Mar-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jan-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Mar-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Feb-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-May-2010
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 2492 - 2493/2011
Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 2492-2493/2011 On 06-11-2017, the Supreme Court (Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel) heard SLP(C) No. 2492-2493/2011 filed by Mehtab (D) by LRS. against Abdul Hamid. The Court set aside the abatement, condoned the delay in filing, and allowed substitution of parties. The petitioner's counsel then sought withdrawal of the petition, which was granted and dismissed as withdrawn, with all pending applications also disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts