RAJ KUMAR SANTOSHI vs PRASHANT MALIK — MA 1176/2026

Case under 1508Rb-criminal Law : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881(Slps Arising Out of Regular Bail Applications, Suspension of Sentence) Section II-D. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010164212026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

MA 1176/2026

Diary Number

16421/2026

Order Date

06-Apr-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

1508RB-Criminal Law : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881(SLPs arising out of Regular Bail applications, suspension of sentence) Section II-D

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJ KUMAR SANTOSHI

    Adv. DURGA DUTT[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRASHANT MALIK

    Adv. DEEPAK PRAKASH[R-1] ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-2] MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-3]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Mention Memo

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Mithal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vipul M. Pancholi

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MA 1176/2026

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Supreme Court clarified its 16.02.2026 order closing a suo moto action on unlicensed money lending. The Court held that existing statutory bars under State Money Lending Laws against unlicensed lending and the "Dam Dupat" doctrine remain enforceable and operative. Courts must dismiss proceedings by unlicensed money lenders unless they produce a license or prove no interest was charged; investigations and appellate remedies may proceed independently of awaited legislation. The miscellaneous application was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case