MAHARSHI M.Y.VEDIC VISHWAVIDYALA vs NARENDRA KUMAR SAUDHARSHAN . — C.A. No. 308/2010

Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010163592007

Filing Date

01-Jun-2007

Registration No

C.A. No. 308/2010

Diary Number

16359/2007

Order Date

02-Sep-2011

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHARSHI M.Y.VEDIC VISHWAVIDYALA

    Adv. MUSHTAQ AHMAD (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NARENDRA KUMAR SAUDHARSHAN .

    Adv. B. S. BANTHIA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 15-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 23-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 07-Oct-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 11-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 04-Sep-2009
  8. 21-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 09-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 24-Apr-2009
  11. 30-Mar-2009
  12. 27-Feb-2009
  13. 16-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 29-Jan-2009
  15. 13-Jan-2009
  16. 01-Dec-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 01-Dec-2008
  18. 21-Oct-2008
  19. 04-Sep-2008
  20. 29-Jul-2008
  21. 09-May-2008
  22. 16-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 07-Apr-2008
  24. 14-Mar-2008
  25. 12-Mar-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 22-Feb-2008
  27. 13-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 30-Jan-2008
  29. 23-Jan-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 09-Jan-2008
  31. 05-Dec-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 13-Aug-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 01-Jun-2007

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 308/2010

casestatus.in Summary

On 02/09/2011, the Supreme Court (Justices Markandey Katju and Chandramauli Kr. Prasad) heard interlocutory applications (IAs 1-19/2011) filed in Civil Appeal No. 308/2010 by Maharshi M.Y. Vedic Vishwavidyala against Narendra Kumar Saudharshan and others. The Court rejected all interlocutory applications after hearing counsel for both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case