INDU JAIN vs PUSHPENDRA SINGH BAGHEL — C.A. No. 1104/2007
Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010162552005
Filing Date
02-Aug-2005
Registration No
C.A. No. 1104/2007
Diary Number
16255/2005
Order Date
01-Feb-2018
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.INDU JAIN
Adv. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BAGHEL
Adv. KAMLENDRA MISHRA ARJUN GARG[R-3] ARJUN GARG[R-4]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Feb-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Feb-2018
Ordinary
Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud
-
31-Jan-2018
Ordinary
Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud
-
24-Jan-2018
Ordinary
Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud
-
18-Jan-2018
Ordinary
Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud
-
17-Jan-2018
Ordinary
Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud
-
14-Dec-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud
-
13-Dec-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud
-
07-Dec-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud
-
06-Dec-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud
-
30-Nov-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud
-
29-Nov-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud
-
28-Nov-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud
-
23-Nov-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud
-
22-Nov-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud
-
16-Nov-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud
-
15-Nov-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud
-
14-Nov-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud
-
13-Jul-2017
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud
-
12-Jul-2017
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud
-
11-Jul-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Mar-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Jul-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Aug-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Sep-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Feb-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Feb-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Jan-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Sep-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Aug-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jul-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-May-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Mar-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Sep-2005
ROPView PDF
-
05-Sep-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Aug-2005
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 1104/2007
SUMMARY: The Supreme Court disposed of Indu Jain's appeal on February 1, 2018, allowing her to continue in her post as Deputy Commissioner Commercial Tax with all benefits and promotion eligibility intact. Though the Court found the High Court's judgment acceptable, it declined to disturb her status due to special circumstances, noting she had been continuing on interim orders and had approximately 4.5 years until superannuation. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts