MUKUND MARUTIRAO KADAM . vs CIDCO AND ORS — SLP(C) No. 26736 - 26737/2013
Case under Section IX. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010160402012
Filing Date
05-May-2012
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 26736 - 26737/2013
Diary Number
16040/2012
Order Date
08-Dec-2017
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MUKUND MARUTIRAO KADAM .
Adv. ARTI SINGH KARANJAWALA & CO. HARISH PANDEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.CIDCO AND ORS
Adv. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR A. S. BHASME (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Dec-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Dec-2017
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi
-
06-Nov-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Nov-2017
Administrative Order
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha
-
07-Jul-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jul-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Oct-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Oct-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Aug-2016
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Aug-2016
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Apr-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Apr-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Mar-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Mar-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Jan-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Jan-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Oct-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Oct-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jul-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jul-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Jul-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Jul-2015
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Jul-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Nov-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Nov-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-May-2012
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 26736 - 26737/2013
Case Summary: Mukund Marutirao Kadam v. CIDCO Hearing Date: 08-12-2017 Outcome: The Supreme Court disposed of the special leave petitions with directions. Petitioners, affected by land acquisition for the Koyana River Dam (1960-1967), had received 12 acres against their 16-acre rehabilitation entitlement. The Court declined to grant Maharashtra further time to file an affidavit and instead directed the State to allot the remaining 4 acres of entitled land within six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts