GOURAV KUMAR @ GOURAV @ GORA vs STATE OF PUNJAB — SLP(Crl) No. 5267/2026

Case under 1504Ab-criminal Law : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985(Slps Arising Out of Anticipatory Bail Applications) Section II-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010159172026

Filing Date

14-Mar-2026

Registration No

SLP(Crl) No. 5267/2026

Diary Number

15917/2026

Order Date

24-Apr-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

1504AB-Criminal Law : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985(SLPs arising out of Anticipatory Bail applications) Section II-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOURAV KUMAR @ GOURAV @ GORA

    Adv. R. C. KAUSHIK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

    Adv. KARAN SHARMA[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.V. Viswanathan

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 17-Apr-2026

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vijay Bishnoi

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 10-Apr-2026

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.V. Viswanathan

  8. 24-Mar-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 14-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(Crl) No. 5267/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SLP(Crl) No. 5267/2026 - Gourav Kumar v. State of Punjab The Supreme Court allowed Gourav Kumar's petition challenging the High Court's denial of anticipatory bail in an NDPS case involving 120 kg of poppy husk. Finding insufficient evidence beyond the confessional statement of co-accused Jasbir Singh to prima facie connect the petitioner to the contraband recovery, the Court granted bail subject to conditions imposed by the Investigating Officer. The petitioner was directed to appear before the IO for interrogation, cooperate in the investigation, and subsequently furnish fresh bail bonds before the Trial Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case