ABDUL AZIZ ABDUL RAFIQUE KADRI vs MOHAMMAD YUSUF SHAIKH HUSSAIN (D) BY LRS — SLP(C) No. 23473 - 23474/2010

Case under Section IX. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010158492010

Filing Date

13-May-2010

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 23473 - 23474/2010

Diary Number

15849/2010

Order Date

15-Oct-2012

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IX

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ABDUL AZIZ ABDUL RAFIQUE KADRI

    Adv. ANAGHA S. DESAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOHAMMAD YUSUF SHAIKH HUSSAIN (D) BY LRS

    Adv. SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 12-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 21-Sep-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 31-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 05-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 27-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 23-Mar-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 13-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 09-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 18-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 11-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 21-Oct-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 16-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 29-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 13-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 13-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 25-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 13-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 30-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 13-May-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 23473 - 23474/2010

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 023473-023474/2010 On 15 October 2012, the Supreme Court heard petitioner Abdul Aziz Abdul Rafique Kadri's special leave petitions challenging the High Court of Bombay's order dated 02 February 2010. The Court found no grounds to interfere with the impugned High Court order and dismissed the petitions. However, the Court directed the respondents to pay Rs. 25,000 as costs as a condition precedent to allowing any amendment of the plaint and filing of additional documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case