UNION OF INDIA . vs PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA ETC. — C.A. No. 6567 - 6569/2010

Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010157852009

Filing Date

20-May-2009

Registration No

C.A. No. 6567 - 6569/2010

Diary Number

15785/2009

Order Date

28-Feb-2012

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 04-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XIV-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA .

    Adv. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA ETC.

    Adv. ANJANI AIYAGARI VIVEK GUPTA B. SUNITA RAO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 17-Nov-2011

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 17-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 24-Jun-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 21-Jun-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 15-Jun-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 03-Jun-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 02-Jun-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 24-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 18-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 11-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 04-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 08-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 30-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 28-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 26-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 05-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 11-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 07-Oct-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 29-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 03-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 15-Jun-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 20-May-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 6567 - 6569/2010

casestatus.in Summary

On 28/02/2012, the Supreme Court heard the interlocutory application concerning discharge of the advocate-on-record in Civil Appeal Nos. 6567-6569/2010 (Pradip Kumar Kedia v. Union of India). The Registrar directed the Registry to clarify in its office report whether a No Objection Certificate (NOC) is required in this case, and instructed the appellant's advocate to verify the situation. The matter was adjourned for further hearing on 12/03/2012. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case