INDICARB LTD vs STATE OF T N — C.A. No. 939/2001
Case under Section Z_NOT KNOWN. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010157401997
Filing Date
17-Sep-1997
Registration No
C.A. No. 939/2001
Diary Number
15740/1997
Order Date
26-Apr-2004
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 08-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.INDICARB LTD
Adv. A. T. M. SAMPATH (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF T N
Adv. GUNTUR PRABHAKAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Apr-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Feb-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Jan-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jan-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Oct-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Sep-2003
ROPView PDF
-
19-Aug-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Aug-2003
ROPView PDF
-
08-Aug-2003
ROPView PDF
-
01-May-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Mar-2003
ROPView PDF
-
14-Feb-2003
ROPView PDF
-
28-Jan-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Nov-2002
ROPView PDF
-
23-Oct-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Sep-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Sep-2002
ROPView PDF
-
06-Sep-2002
ROPView PDF
-
16-Aug-2002
ROPView PDF
-
12-Aug-2002
ROPView PDF
-
05-Aug-2002
ROPView PDF
-
29-Jul-2002
ROPView PDF
-
15-Jul-2002
ROPView PDF
-
10-Jul-2002
ROPView PDF
-
17-Jun-2002
ROPView PDF
-
09-May-2002
ROPView PDF
-
29-Apr-2002
ROPView PDF
-
12-Apr-2002
ROPView PDF
-
09-Apr-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Mar-2002
ROPView PDF
-
06-Mar-2002
ROPView PDF
-
20-Feb-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Jan-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jan-2002
ROPView PDF
-
08-Jan-2002
ROPView PDF
-
24-Jul-2001
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jul-2001
ROPView PDF
-
25-Jan-2001
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Jan-2001
ROPView PDF
-
17-Sep-1997
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 939/2001
On 26/04/2004, the Supreme Court heard interlocutory applications (I.A. Nos. 4-6) in Civil Appeal Nos. 936-938 of 2001 filed by Indicarb Limited against the State of Tamil Nadu. The Court found that the main appeals had already been disposed of and therefore dismissed the interlocutory applications as no further orders were required on them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts