BALAKRAM vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH — SLP(Crl) No. 5941/2026

Case under 1511Misc-criminal Law : Criminal Matters Other Than Covered by the Aforesaid Categories(slps Arising Out of Quashing Applications, Orders Framing Charge, Summoning Orders, Interim Orders in Criminal Matters, Withdrawal of Prosecution, Orders for Further Investigation/re-investigation Etc. Section II. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010157362026

Filing Date

14-Mar-2026

Registration No

SLP(Crl) No. 5941/2026

Diary Number

15736/2026

Order Date

06-May-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

1511MISC-Criminal Law : Criminal matters other than covered by the aforesaid categories(SLPs arising out of quashing applications, orders framing charge, summoning orders, interim orders in criminal matters, withdrawal of prosecution, orders for further investigation/re-investigation etc. Section II

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BALAKRAM

    Adv. ANILENDRA PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

    Adv. SHAURYA SAHAY [R-1] SHAURYA SAHAY [R-2] SHAURYA SAHAY [R-3] SHAURYA SAHAY [R-4] SHAURYA SAHAY [R-5] SHAURYA SAHAY [R-6]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manmohan

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 27-Apr-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manmohan

  6. 15-Apr-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 15-Apr-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manmohan

  8. 10-Apr-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 10-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 14-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(Crl) No. 5941/2026

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SLP(Crl) No. 005941/2026 - Balakram v. State of Uttar Pradesh Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed Balakram's special leave petition challenging the High Court's rejection of his plea to exhume his son's body for a fresh autopsy. The Court upheld the original autopsy finding that death resulted from antemortem electrocution by lightning strike, after an AIIMS Medical Board unanimously confirmed this conclusion based on video evidence and postmortem examination. Next Steps: No further proceedings; the Medical Board's opinion remains sealed as part of the court record. All pending applications are disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case